* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > > I've uploaded the latest patch, rebased against master, with my changes > > to here: http://snowman.net/~sfrost/rls_ringerc_sf.patch.gz as I don't > > believe it'd clear the mailing list (it's 29k). > > Please actually post it, for the archives' sake. 29k is far below the > list limit. (Which I don't know exactly what it is ... but certainly > in the hundreds of KB.)
Huh, thought it was more like 25k. Well, here goes then...
> > I'll take a look at changing the cache key to include user ID and
> > ripping out the plan invalidation logic from the current patch tomorrow
> > but I seriously doubt I'll be able to get all of that done in the next
> > day or two.
>
> TBH I think we are up against the deadline. April 15 was the agreed-to
> drop dead date for pushing new features into 9.4.
Yeah. :/ May be for the best anyway, this should be able to go in early
in the 9.5 cycle and get more testing and refinement. Still stinks
though as I feel like this patch didn't get the attention it should have
due to a simple misunderstanding, but we do need to stop at some point
to get a release together.
Thanks,
Stephen
rls_ringerc_sf.patch.gz
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
