On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > I was wondering whether an ALTER TABLE command is really the right way > to approach this. If we had an ALTER-type command, presumably the > implication is that its effects would be global to all backends. But > the uses that I've seen for suspending trigger invocations would be > happier with a local, temporary setting that only affects the current > backend. Any thoughts about that?
I may be missing something here, but the only circumstance where i could see such being useful would be a load of a database ... other then that, how would overriding triggers be considered a good thing? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
