Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, I thought I did it, and it did work on my limited number of test
> > cases.  Seems you got it fully working.
> Actually, it failed for me (and evidently for Barry) on exactly the test
> case you posted along with the patch.  You said
> > test=> set autocommit = off;
> > SET
> > test=> commit;
> > WARNING:  COMMIT: no transaction in progress
> but in fact I saw the COMMIT succeeding without complaint.  I was
> meaning to ask you just what code you'd tested, because this morning's
> CVS tip did *not* behave as above.

I am stumped myself as well.  I still have the CVS of my old code, and
it fails just as you saw, but I know I tested it and copied that into
the email via cut/paste so my only guess is that I tweaked something
after I ran the test and if broke something else.  If you got it all
working now, I won't research further.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

Reply via email to