Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well, I thought I did it, and it did work on my limited number of test > > cases. Seems you got it fully working. > > Actually, it failed for me (and evidently for Barry) on exactly the test > case you posted along with the patch. You said > > > test=> set autocommit = off; > > SET > > test=> commit; > > WARNING: COMMIT: no transaction in progress > > COMMIT > > but in fact I saw the COMMIT succeeding without complaint. I was > meaning to ask you just what code you'd tested, because this morning's > CVS tip did *not* behave as above.
I am stumped myself as well. I still have the CVS of my old code, and it fails just as you saw, but I know I tested it and copied that into the email via cut/paste so my only guess is that I tweaked something after I ran the test and if broke something else. If you got it all working now, I won't research further. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
