On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > > On 4/17/14, 8:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > We could in fact implement #2, I imagine, by destroying and recreating > > the entire language interpreter. So I could imagine implementing a > > "DISCARD INTERPRETERS" kind of command that would zap the current > > interpreter(s) for whichever PL languages happened to feel like > > cooperating with the command. > > More generally, any extension could maintain any kind of cross-call > state. plproxy, dblink, pgmemcache come to mind. A general hook into > DISCARD might be doable, but then it's not clear how to categorize this > into DISCARD subcommands. >
I proposed some like that in a previous message [1]. Regards, [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cafcns+p+pmfhkiptf1xbz3neg8d0mtenb021h2fug049333...@mail.gmail.com -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL >> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br >> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com >> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
