Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:20:42AM +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote: >> On 23/04/14 00:40, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >>>> Where are we on the default JSONB opclass change?
>>> FWIW, I still don't have any strong opinion here. I defer to others on >>> this question. >> I vote for changing it, even though neither option is ideal I think >> that given the nature of datatype the current default will break >> inserts for common usage pattern and that's much worse than not >> being able to use the index for some operators. > I agree. We should choose the most general option as the default. That seems to be the consensus, but now we need a name for the soon-to-be-not-default opclass. What's a good short adjective for it? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers