Tom Lane wrote: > I just noticed that rewriteHandler.c contains a subroutine orderRules() > that reorders the rules for a relation into the order > non-instead rules > qualified instead rules > unqualified instead rules > This conflicts with the feature we'd added to 7.3 to fire rules in > alphabetical order. (What will presently happen is they'll be fired > alphabetically in each of these categories.) > > I see that the logic in fireRules() assumes that rules are processed in > this order, but that would be fairly easy to fix. Is there any other > good reason for doing this reordering? I'd like to remove orderRules() > and implement straight alphabetical ordering.
Unless Jan has an objection, I think alpha is best, because it matches trigger rule odering. That original rule ordering isn't something anyone is going to figure out on their own. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
