On 2014-04-25 17:19:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 2014-04-25 17:05:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I think this is just a hangover from > >> before we paid much attention to expression typmods at all, and > >> propose the attached patch. > > > Any chance it could cause problems with stored trees being different > > from newly generated ones due to it? I.e. is it something that can be > > done without a catversion bump? > > Not sure. I wasn't proposing this as a back-patch, just 9.4 only.
Then a clear +1 for me. It's rather confusing to see bpchar, a type very rarely used explicitly in explain output. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
