Le 01/05/2014 04:56, Robert Haas a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Thomas Reiss <thomas.re...@dalibo.com> wrote: >> You can find attached a small patch to fix the pg_replication_slots >> documentation. The slot_type and plugin are not in the appropriate >> order, slot_name and plugin have a wrong type and xmin appears two times. > > Without the patch, the description of catalog_xmin is: > > <entry>The <literal>xmin</literal>, or oldest transaction ID, that this > slot forces to be retained in the system catalogs. </entry> > > With the patch it's: > > <entry>The oldest transaction that this slot needs the database to > retain. <literal>VACUUM</literal> cannot remove catalog tuples deleted > by any later transaction. > > That's only one word different from the language for xmin, which > doesn't seem quite right. Committed after fixing that. > > ...Robert >
Thanks -- Thomas Reiss Consultant Dalibo http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
