Le 01/05/2014 04:56, Robert Haas a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Thomas Reiss <thomas.re...@dalibo.com> wrote:
>> You can find attached a small patch to fix the pg_replication_slots
>> documentation. The slot_type and plugin are not in the appropriate
>> order, slot_name and plugin have a wrong type and xmin appears two times.
> Without the patch, the description of catalog_xmin is:
>       <entry>The <literal>xmin</literal>, or oldest transaction ID, that this
>       slot forces to be retained in the system catalogs. </entry>
> With the patch it's:
>       <entry>The oldest transaction that this slot needs the database to
>       retain.  <literal>VACUUM</literal> cannot remove catalog tuples deleted
>       by any later transaction.
> That's only one word different from the language for xmin, which
> doesn't seem quite right.  Committed after fixing that.
> ...Robert


Thomas Reiss
Consultant Dalibo
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to