Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > Seems there is no documentation for the 9.4 worker_spi contrib module. Is > > this OK? The comment at the top of the C file says: > > > > * Sample background worker code that demonstrates various coding > > * patterns: establishing a database connection; starting and > > committing > > * transactions; using GUC variables, and heeding SIGHUP to reread > > * the configuration file; reporting to pg_stat_activity; using the > > * process latch to sleep and exit in case of postmaster death. > > worker_spi is not new in 9.4; it was added in 9.3 by Alvaro in commit > da07a1e856511dca59cbb1357616e26baa64428e. I agree that it should be > documented like all of the other contrib modules,
Uh. It's a code sample. I didn't ever consider documenting it was a necessity, or I would have done it. I don't think it needs any documentation now, either (in Docbook form I mean.) -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
