On 05/06/2014 05:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
On 2014-05-06 09:37:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Sorry, it is *way* too late for 9.4.


It's imo a regression/oversight introduced in the pg_lsn patch. Not a
new feature.

You can argue that if you like, but it doesn't matter.  It's too late for
a change as big as that for such an inessential feature.  We are in the
stabilization game at this point, and adding features is not the thing to
be doing.

FWIW, I agree with Andres that this would be a reasonable thing to add. Exactly the kind of oversight that we should be fixing at this stage in the release cycle.

- Heikki


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to