On Tue, May  6, 2014 at 06:24:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Tue, May  6, 2014 at 05:35:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> But I don't see the reason why we shouldn't expect ecpg's headers to
> >> conform to our layout rules.
> > I don't know who ecpg got in there.  Let me know what you would like
> > done.
> What I'm suggesting is that, in HEAD only, you remove these exclusion
> entries:
> > /ecpg/include/(sqlda|sqltypes)\.h$
> > /ecpg/include/preproc/struct\.h$
> then redo the pgindent run (presumably only those three files will change)
> and make any necessary updates in the ecpg expected files.

OK, done.  ecpg exclusion removed, pgindent rerun (it only changed
sqlda.h), and ecpg regression tests updated, all only in head.

> Note that it's just chance that the back branch updates didn't hit those
> three files already, since you said you weren't using the filter on them.


  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to