Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The early-exit code path supposes that JB_ROOT_COUNT is absolutely
>> reliable as an indicator that there's nothing in the jsonb value.
>> On the other hand, the realloc logic inside the iteration loop implies
>> that JB_ROOT_COUNT is just an untrustworthy estimate. Which theory is
>> correct? And why is there not a comment to be seen anywhere? If the code
>> is correct then this logic is certainly worthy of a comment or three.
> JsonbIteratorNext() is passed "false" as its skipNested argument. It's
> recursive.
And?
I think you're just proving the point that this code is woefully
underdocumented. If there were, somewhere, some comment explaining
what the heck JB_ROOT_COUNT actually counts, maybe I wouldn't be asking
this question. jsonb.h is certainly not divulging any such information.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
