Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 05/07/2014 04:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> A README file would be better,
>> perhaps, but there's not a specific directory associated with the jsonb
>> code; so I think this sort of info belongs either in jsonb.h or in the
>> file header comment for jsonb_gin.c.
> Is there any reason we couldn't have a README.jsonb?
We could, but the only place I can see to put it would be in
backend/utils/adt/, which seems like a poor precedent; I don't want to end
up with forty-two README.foo files in there. The header comments for the
jsonbxxx.c files are probably better candidates for collecting this sort
of info.
(The larger problem here is that utils/adt/ has become a catchbasin for
all kinds of stuff that can barely squeeze under the rubric of "abstract
data type". But fixing that is something I don't care to tackle now.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
