Gavin Flower <gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz> writes: > On 09/05/14 15:34, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Looks good. I was thinking the jsonb_ops name could remain unchanged >> and the jsonb_hash_ops could be called jsonb_combo_ops as it combines >> the key and value into a single index entry.
> If you have 'jsonb_combo_ops' - then surely 'jsonb_op' should be called > 'jsonb_xxx_ops', where the 'xxx' distinguishes that from > 'jsonb_combo_ops'? I guess, if any appropriate wording of 'xxx' was too > cumbersome, then it would be worse. Yeah, I'm disinclined to change the opclass names now. It's not apparent to me that "combo" is a better choice than "hash" for the second opclass. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers