On 2014-05-10 23:21:34 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > And adding a proper unsigned type doesn't sound like a small amount of work. > > Perhaps not, but it's overdue. We ought to have one.
Maybe. But there's so many things to decide around it that I don't think it's a good prerequisite for not showing essentially corrupted values in a supported scenario. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
