Tom Lane wrote: > It might also be reasonable to create a wrapper macro along the line of > "PG_STD_IO_BUFFERING()" that would encapsulate the whole sequence > setvbuf(stdout, NULL, _IOLBF, 0); > setvbuf(stderr, NULL, _IONBF, 0); > Or maybe we should have separate macros for those two calls. Or maybe > this is just a useless layer of abstraction and PG_IOLBF is enough > to make the calls portable. > > Thoughts?
I don't really know all that much about this stuff, but see commits 6eda3e9c27781dec369542a9b20cba7c3d832a5e and its parent about isolationtester. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
