Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Isn't the far more obvious thing ot just not build postgres with -pie on
> 32bit? It's hardly a security benefit if it allows plain user to crash
> the server.

Yeah, that's what I was doing when I was at Red Hat --- PIE mode would
be nice, but not when it breaks basic functionality.

I think throwing an error out of a SIGBUS handler is right out.  There
would be no way to know exactly what code we were interrupting.  It's
the same reason we don't let, eg, the SIGALRM handler throw a timeout
error directly (in most places anyway).

>> * PostgreSQL allocates lots of heap using brk() instead of mmap()

> It doesn't really do that, btw. It's the libc's mmap that makes those
> decisions, not postgres.

It occurs to me that maybe this is a glibc bug, not a kernel bug?

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to