On 2014-05-19 23:40:32 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: > On 19.5.2014 22:11, Tom Lane wrote: > > Tomas Vondra <t...@fuzzy.cz> writes: > > I intentionally didn't do that, first because I have only a limited > > amount of confidence in the patch, and second because I don't think > > it matters for anything except CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY testing. > > Which surely you're not going to do in the back branches? > > Yes, I'm running this on HEAD only. > > I was however wondering if this might be related to OOM errors a few > local users reported to us. IIRC they've been using temporary tables > quite heavily - not sure if that could be related.
I've significant doubts that it is. I suggest you disable memory overcommit - then you'll get nice memory dumps on stderr instead of oom kills. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
