On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Josh Berkus wrote: > >> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to > >> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other > >> client utils? No? > > > > There are others who think this has already happened. > > > > Well, I just compiled beta1, and it's still called recvlogical.
It was named pg_receivelogical initially. Then people argued that that's too long and voted for pg_recvlogical. I renamed it even though I didn't particularly like the new name. I fail to see the point in renaming it again. And I haven't seen any concensus for doing so either. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
