Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

[Philip Warner]

At 10:03 PM 23/10/2002 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

It is much cleaner to just duplicate the entire API so you don't have
any limitations or failure cases.

We may still end up using macros in pg_dump to cope with cases where off_t & fseeko are not defined - if there are any. I presume we would then just revert to calling fseek/ftell etc.




----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html