Due to the opened window of the pg_control/catalog version bump a chance
has opened to fix a inconsistency I've recently been pointed
Namely that replication slots are named 'slot_name' in one half of the
cases and 'slotname' in the other. That's in views, SRF columns,
function parameters and the primary_slotname recovery.conf parameter.

My personal tendency would be to make it slot_name everywhere except the
primary_slotname recovery.conf parameter. There we already have
precedent for shortening names.

Other opinions?


Andres Freund

 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to