On 2014-06-09 10:14:32 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > It did not use to blow this question off: back around 8.3 you got > > DELETE_IN_PROGRESS if the tuple had a delete pending. I think we need > > less laziness + fuzzy thinking here. Maybe we should have a separate > > HEAPTUPLE_INSERT_AND_DELETE_IN_PROGRESS result code? Is it *really* > > the case that callers other than VACUUM itself are okay with failing > > to make this distinction? > > I think that would be a good idea for conceptual clarity if nothing > else. If callers are OK with it, then they can treat both of those > codes alike; but then at least there's clear evidence as to the > author's intent.
I am happy to introduce the code for that. But it'd have to be >=9.4 or > 9.4? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers