Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> The attached draft patch fixes this by deleting unused output expressions >> from unflattened subqueries, so that we get: >> ... >> I'm not entirely convinced that it's worth the extra planning cycles, >> though. Given the small number of complaints to date, it might not >> be worth doing this. Thoughts?
> I've encountered this issue before and think it would be great to fix > it. I'm not sure precisely how many cycles it's worth paying, but > definitely more than zero. We have a couple votes for this patch and no one has spoken against it, so I'll go ahead and push it into HEAD. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers