On 06/10/2014 02:46 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Jun 10, 2014, at 12:06 PM, Oleg Bartunov <obartu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> we have many other tasks than guessing the language name. >> jsquery is just an extension, which we invent to test our indexing >> stuff. Eventually, it grew out. I think we'll think on better name >> if developers agree to have it in core. For now, jsquery is good >> enough to us. >> >> jsquery name doesn't need to be used at all, by the way. > > Yeah, I was more on about syntax than the name. We can change that any time > before you release it.
I've been poking at the various json-query syntaxes you forwarded, and none of them really work for the actual jsquery features. Also, the existing syntax has the advantage of being *simple*, relatively speaking, and reasonably similar to JSONPATH. In other words, what I'm saying is: I don't think there's an existing, poplular syntax we could reasonably use. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
