On 06/17/2014 11:22 AM, Vik Fearing wrote: > On 06/17/2014 09:43 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote: >> On 06/14/2014 09:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> As I mentioned awhile ago, I'm thinking about implementing the >>>> SQL-standard construct >>>> >>>> UPDATE foo SET ..., (a,b,...) = (SELECT x,y,...), ... >>>> >>>> I've run into a rather nasty problem, which is how does this interact >>>> with expansion of NEW references in ON UPDATE rules? >> Was'nt there a plan (consensus?) about deprecating rules altogether ? > I believe that was just for user access to them, ie CREATE RULE. I > don't think there was ever question of purging them from the code base. But are there any cases, where UPDATE rules are created behind the scenes ?
-- Hannu Krosing PostgreSQL Consultant Performance, Scalability and High Availability 2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
