On 06/18/2014 10:48 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2014-06-18 10:44:56 -0700, j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
>> I'm unclear on why we would overload pg_resetxlog for this.
> Because pg_resetxlog already does something very similar, so the patch
> is small. If it were independent, it would have to copy quite some code
> from pg_resetxlog.
Aha. In that case, it seems like it's time to rename pg_resetxlog, if
it does a bunch of things that aren't resetting the xlog.
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: