Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> wrote: > I've already said that I now think we should use the standard > CREATE TRIGGER syntax to specify the transition tables, and that > if we do that we don't need the reloption that's in the patch. > If you ignore the 19 lines of new code to add that reloption, > absolutely 100% of the code changes in the patch so far are in > trigger.c and trigger.h.
Although nobody has actually framed their feedback as a review, I feel that I have enough to work with to throw the patch into Waiting on Author status. Since I started with the assumption that I was going to be using standard syntax and got a ways into that before convincing myself it was a bad idea, I should have a new version of the patch working that way in a couple days. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
