On 2014-06-19 11:00:51 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Merlin Moncure wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <a...@2ndquadrant.com> > > wrote: > > > Let's not pretend to support platforms we have no practical way of > > > verifying. > > > > This is key. The buildfarm defines the set of platforms we support. > > This means that either Renesas should supply us with a bunch of > buildfarm members for their SuperH and M32R stuff, or they should be > considered unsupported as well.
Hm. I've missed SuperH in my comparison - it's not actually documented to be a supported platform... > I don't really care all that much about Linux and the glibc situation on > M32R; I mean that platform is weird enough that it might well have its > own, unheard-of Unix clone. They have their own compiler for a some realtime os (not posix-y and discontinued!) - but that doesn't support the gcc syntax used by s_lock.h. So it's already not supported. > But if people expect to use Postgres on it, we need BF members. Yes. But I think it's exceedingly unlikely. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers