* Craig Ringer ([email protected]) wrote: > On 06/18/2014 08:00 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > > PG would need to enforce that it's only used for temporary objects > > as well, of course.. Or at least, that was my thinking on this. > > A way to put UNLOGGED objects in such a space and have them recovered > if they vanish would also be valuable, IMO.
Interesting idea.
> Not necessarily in the same patch, I'd just rather keep it in mind so
> any chosen design doesn't preclude adding that later.
Perhaps we need a more complex definition than just "temporary
tablespace", as in, we should have a way for users to say "this
tablespace is allowed to have objects of type X, Y, Z"? I can see a
couple of ways to do that and I don't think it'd require much in the way
of changes to the current patch...
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
