Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>  Tom> If we're going to do that, I think it needs to be in 9.4.  Are
>  Tom> you going to work up a patch?

> Do we want a decision on the fn_extra matter first, or shall I do one
> patch for the econtext, and a following one for fn_extra?

I think they're somewhat independent, and probably best patched
separately.  In any case orderedsetagg.c's use of fn_extra is a local
matter that we'd not really have to fix in 9.4, except to the extent
that you think third-party code might copy it.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to