On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This seems to make sense. Barring objection, I will commit this
>> only in HEAD.


> I'm inclined to think this is a slight improvement, just for the
> sake of consistency with peer level information.  You probably
> already noticed, but the patch as submitted neglects to close the
> prior sect2 block before opening the new one.

Yes, thanks for pointing out that!


Fujii Masao

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to