On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Christoph Berg <c...@df7cb.de> wrote:
> > Re: Amit Kapila 2014-06-26 <CAA4eK1+mUTjc=GXJK3bYtSwV2BmBni=
phevbqlqkhduv9cw...@mail.gmail.com>
> > >
> > > How about adding a note in Alter System so that users are aware of
> > > such behaviour and can ensure that they don't have duplicate entries?
> >
> > If the behavior isn't going to change, that issue need to be
> > documented, sure.
>
> I will send a patch to address this unless someone comes with a better
> way to address this and if no one objects to adding a note in Alter System
> documentation.

Please find the patch attached to address the above concern.  I have
updated docs, so that users can be aware of such behaviour.

I will add this patch for next CF to avoid getting lost, however I believe
it should be done for 9.4.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: alter_system_postmaster_params_v1.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to