* Kohei KaiGai (kai...@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote:
> What I'd like to implement is adjustment of query like:
>   SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE (x like '%abc%') AND (quals by built-in RLS)
>           AND (quals by extension-1) AND ... AND (quals by extension-N);
> I never mind even if qualifiers in the second block are connected with OR'd
> manner, however, I want RLS infrastructure to accept additional security
> models provided by extensions.

Would having a table-level 'AND'-vs-'OR' modifier for the RLS policies
on that table be sufficient for what you're looking for?  That seems a
simple enough addition which would still allow more complex groups to be
developed later on...



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to