KaiGai, * Kohei KaiGai (kai...@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote: > What I'd like to implement is adjustment of query like: > SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE (x like '%abc%') AND (quals by built-in RLS) > AND (quals by extension-1) AND ... AND (quals by extension-N); > I never mind even if qualifiers in the second block are connected with OR'd > manner, however, I want RLS infrastructure to accept additional security > models provided by extensions.
Would having a table-level 'AND'-vs-'OR' modifier for the RLS policies on that table be sufficient for what you're looking for? That seems a simple enough addition which would still allow more complex groups to be developed later on... Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature