On 5/11/14 6:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
The $64 question is whether we'd accept an implementation that fails if the target table has children (ie, is partitioned). That seems to me to not be up to the project's usual quality expectations, but maybe if there's enough demand for a partial solution we should do so.
I think that partial support is better than no support unless there are concerns about forwards compatibility. I don't see such concerns having been expressed for this feature.
.marko -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
