Simon Riggs wrote: > On 15 July 2014 19:15, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > Where was the discussion of > > why this change should be back-patched? > > Your question has broader implications. Currently commit messages do > not reference the conversations that led to them and a great many use > entirely different descriptions on-list and in the commit message, nor > are entries added to conversations to reflect commits.
I try to mention message-ids in commit messages. Are these useful? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
