Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > Have you figured out any way to actually track down which para has the > problem itself, or is it all manual work?
Oh ... the TUG page now has a recipe for finding the problem less painfully, which I don't recall having seen before: http://ftp.tug.org/mail-archives/pdftex/2002-February/002216.html In short, you can add a "draft" option that lets PDF output get generated anyway, and then you can actually see exactly what link is getting split. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
