On 7/28/14 11:27 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 26 July 2014 18:14, Marko Tiikkaja <ma...@joh.to> wrote:
Today I'd like to present a way to get rid of code like this:
You haven't explained this very well... there is nothing that explains
WHY you want this.
In the absence of a good explanation and a viable benefit, I would
vote -1 for this feature suggestion.
Yes, I did a poor job in the original email, but I did explain my
reasoning later:
> Yes, you can already do this with RAISE but that seems more like an
> accident than anything else. I feel a dedicated syntax is less error
> prone and makes the intent clearer to people reading the code. But I
> realize I might be in the minority with this.
I guess -3, +0 is enough that I'll be dropping the patch. Thanks to
everyone who had a look.
.marko
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
