David Rowley wrote: > I've also been looking at the isolation tests and I see that you've added a > series of tests for NOWAIT. I was wondering why you did that as that's > really existing code, probably if you thought the tests were a bit thin > around NOWAIT then maybe that should be a separate patch?
The isolation tester is new so we don't have nearly enough tests for it. Adding more meaningful tests is good even if they're unrelated to the patch at hand. FWIW you can use configure --enable-coverage and "make coverage-html" to get coverage reports. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
