Simon Riggs <> writes:
> On 25 July 2014 20:47, Tom Lane <> wrote:
>> Another idea would be to

> ...persist the optimal dump order in the database.

> That way we can maintain the correct dump order each time we do DDL,
> which is only a small incremental cost, no matter how many objects we
> have.

I don't see any obvious way to make it incremental; so I doubt that
it would be a small extra cost.  In any case I disagree that making DDL
slower to make pg_dump faster is a good tradeoff.  Many people seldom
or never use pg_dump.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to