Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 25 July 2014 20:47, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Another idea would be to
> ...persist the optimal dump order in the database.
> That way we can maintain the correct dump order each time we do DDL,
> which is only a small incremental cost, no matter how many objects we
I don't see any obvious way to make it incremental; so I doubt that
it would be a small extra cost. In any case I disagree that making DDL
slower to make pg_dump faster is a good tradeoff. Many people seldom
or never use pg_dump.
regards, tom lane
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: