"Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J]" <kbak...@its.jnj.com> writes:
> Since ensuring there are not orphaned back-end processes is vital, could we
> add a check for getppid() == 1 ?
No. Or yeah, we could, but that patch would add no security worth
mentioning. For example, someone could launch a query that runs for
many minutes, and would have plenty of time to conflict with a
subsequently-started postmaster.
Even without that issue, there's no consensus that forcibly making
orphan backends exit would be a good thing. (Some people would
like to have such an option, but the key word in that sentence is
"option".)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
