Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But relation "a" *does* exist at the start of client 2's operation. > While I'm not here to defend the exact phrasing of this error message, > it does seem to me that it's appropriate to give a different error > message than what appears when the table wasn't found at all.
Ok, fair enough -- I agree that we should treat the two cases differently. But one thing I think we should do in any case is improve the wording of the error message. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
