On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfre...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Larry White <ljw1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I attached a json file of approximately 513K. It contains two repetitions of >> a single json structure. The values are quasi-random. It might make a decent >> test case of meaningfully sized data. > > > I have a 59M in plain SQL (10M compressed, 51M on-disk table size) > collection of real-world JSON data. > > This data is mostly counters and anciliary info stored in json for the > flexibility, more than anything else, since it's otherwise quite > structured: most values share a lot between each other (in key names) > but there's not much redundancy within single rows. > > Value length stats (in text format): > > min: 14 > avg: 427 > max: 23239 > > If anyone's interested, contact me personally (I gotta anonimize the > info a bit first, since it's production info, and it's too big to > attach on the ML).
Oh, that one has a 13k toast, not very interesting. But I've got another (very similar), 47M table, 40M toast, length distribution: min: 19 avg: 474 max: 20370 Not sure why it's got a bigger toast having a similar distribution. Tells just how meaningless min/avg/max stats are :( -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
