On 2014-08-14 16:03:08 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
> I hit the following on 9.4 testing logical decoding.
>
>
> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(prev_first_lsn < cur_txn->first_lsn)", File:
> "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 618)
> LOG: server process (PID 3801) was terminated by signal 6: Aborted
I saw that recently while hacking around, but I thought it was because
of stuff I'd added. But apparently not.
Hm. I think I see how that might happen. It might be possible (and
harmless) if two subxacts of the same toplevel xact have the same
first_lsn. But if it's not just <= vs < it'd be worse.
> Unfortunately I don't have a core file and I haven't been able to reproduce
> this.
Any information about the workload? Any chance you still have the data
directory around?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
