Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 08/17/2014 08:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I was just going over the release notes, and noticed the bit about
>> timestamp and timestamptz now being rendered in a fixed ISO-8601-compliant
>> format rather than whatever random DateStyle is in use. That's fine,
>> but I wonder why the same approach wasn't applied to type date?
> But yes, I agree it should be fixed. Whatever we output should be
> suitable as input for the string-argument constructor of class Date.
OK. I think I can fix it, if you don't have time.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
