On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 1. > > + Number of parallel connections to perform the operation. This > > option will enable the vacuum > > + operation to run on parallel connections, at a time one table will > > be operated on one connection. > > > > a. How about describing w.r.t asynchronous connections > > instead of parallel connections? > > I don't think "asynchronous" is a good choice of word.
Agreed. >Maybe "simultaneous"? Not sure. How about *concurrent* or *multiple*? With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
