Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2014-08-20 00:58:22 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> I don't much like adding a separate function for every SSL implementation, >> but you've got a point that it would be nice to make it difficult to call >> PQgetSSLstruct() and just assume that the returned struct is e.g an OpenSSL >> struct, while it's actually something else. Perhaps:
> A good reason to not have functions with the respective functions is > that it requires either including the relevant headers or adding forward > declarations of the libraries type. It requires no such thing. What we do for PQgetssl() is declare it as returning "void *", and we could easily do the same for other libraries. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers