On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com>
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <
hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote:
> > >Wouldn't it make a lot more sense to create it correctly in the first
> >
> > Looking at the code, I think it is very well possible to create
> > it correctly in the first place without much extra work.  I will
> > send a patch if nobody sees any problem with this change.
> Attached patch implements the above suggested fix.
> I have removed the earlier code which was used to update the
> symlink path.

Today morning, I realised that there is one problem with the
patch I sent yesterday and the problem is that incase user
has not given -T option, it will not be able to create the symlink
for appropriate path.  Attached patch fix this issue.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: pg_basebackup_relocate_tablespace_v4.patch
Description: Binary data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to