Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-08-26 15:01:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, exactly. Given current hardware trends, data compression is
>> becoming more of a win not less as time goes on: CPU cycles are cheap
>> even compared to main memory access, let alone mass storage. So I'm
>> thinking we want to adopt a compression-friendly data format even if
>> it measures out as a small loss currently.
> On the other hand the majority of databases these day fit into main
> memory due to its increasing sizes and postgres is more often CPU than
> IO bound.
Well, better data compression helps make that true ;-). And don't forget
cache effects; actual main memory is considered slow these days.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
