On 2014-09-01 15:19:41 +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote: > On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It bad signal to have two languages plpgsql and plpgsql2. Who will believe > > to us so we will continue development of plpgsql? > > Depends on how you define "development". > Bugfixes of plpgsql? Yes, of course. > New features? No, but that's a non-issue since we all know it's more > or less impossible to introduce new features without breaking > compatibility, I think you will agree on that, no?
Sorry, but that's just plain wrong. There've been plenty of new features for plpgsql. You're not very convincing if you use bogus arguments like this. EOD for me. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
