Marko Tiikkaja <ma...@joh.to> wrote: > Sounds like in this case you'd only use set-oriented programming > at the end of the transaction, no?
I guess -- more properly I would say "in the final database transaction for that financial transaction." And no, that never made me wish that plpgsql functions defaulted to throwing errors for DML statements that affected more than one row. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
